Copenhagen Climate
United Nations Climate Change Conference bellicose. The General Assembly had intended to save the planet, almost let the fragmentation of the country on the planet. Endless quarrels between North and South, developed and developing countries blame each other, the atmosphere of the meeting lumpy, the prospects for the meeting is worrying.
This is because the climate conference is to establish a foundation in the academic assumption that intergovernmental meetings. The conference theme is that global climate is warming, in order to save the planet, it is necessary to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. In order to achieve this goal, the developed countries must gradually reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to provide certain compensation to developing countries. While the developing countries for their own survival needs, but also should try to set an example, work together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions commitments.
However, the Council, the University of East Anglia in a leaked report caused a great uproar. The report shows that the actual scientific result, in recent years, global climate change is not as exaggerated as some politicians are terrible, the contrary, climate change is showing a relatively constant state. Things are not in conformity with the conclusions of the scientific survey of "political correctness" requirement, so the United Nations Climate Change Conference, this view was being "deliberately forgotten".
Western countries, is keen to select "harmful to the climate theory", and to convene an international conference of this white elephant, deep heart. In the financial crisis, saw its losing the right of international trade and international finance initiative, so set up a new subject, hoping through the establishment of carbon dioxide emissions trading mechanism, re-grasp the opportunities of trade.
This calculation is very simple to identify a target to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Force developing countries to accept such a total control targets, and then, in the international community to establish a carbon emissions trading mechanisms. Developed countries in the short term through the purchase of carbon dioxide emissions targets to developing countries so that developing countries have tasted the sweetness. However, when the industrialization of developing countries into the peak times, they will increase the carbon dioxide emissions, in this case, the developed countries to developing countries through the turn of carbon dioxide emissions targets to sell to make huge profits, but also can impose special tariffs on carbon dioxide, thus weakening the competitiveness of their products in developing countries.
Such a sinister intentions in the beginning of the General Assembly has just been drafted by the host country Denmark meeting documents already disclosed. Developed on the surface seems to be preparing to commit to reducing carbon dioxide emissions, but they as much as possible to force developing countries to accept their offer, continue to cut aid to developing countries, resulting in the issue of carbon dioxide emissions, firmly seize the initiative.
The Chinese government at this meeting for criticism, it is expected. As the largest developing country, but also as the world’s carbon dioxide emissions than any other country, China is to bear the pressure of developing countries. Scandinavia’s argument sound, has crossed the ocean to China. The Chinese government should take drastic decisions, it is necessary to prevent the export products of Western countries to impose special tariffs on carbon dioxide, while avoiding making more commitments. Because that would mean slowing China’s growth rate, it means that China had to bear the negative consequences of industrialization in developed countries.
您必须登录 后才能发表评论.